Free research tool

Free CASP-Style Critical Appraisal Checklist

Work through structured appraisal questions for randomised controlled trials, qualitative studies, cohort studies and systematic reviews.

This is an original study-appraisal companion and not the official CASP checklist.

1

Research focus

Is the research aim or question clearly stated?

Look for a clear description of what the study is trying to investigate.

2

Study design

Is the chosen study design appropriate for the research question?

Consider whether the design can reasonably address the stated aim.

3

Participants and sampling

Is the participant selection or sampling approach appropriate?

Consider recruitment, inclusion criteria, representativeness and possible selection bias.

4

Data collection

Are the data collection methods clearly described and suitable?

Check whether the methods are appropriate, consistent and sufficiently explained.

5

Bias and limitations

Have important sources of bias or methodological limitation been considered?

Look for selection bias, measurement bias, confounding and other threats to validity.

6

Findings

Are the main findings clearly presented and supported by the data?

Check whether conclusions are consistent with the results actually reported.

7

Confidence in findings

Is there enough information to judge confidence in the findings?

Consider uncertainty, precision, consistency, credibility and completeness of reporting.

8

Applicability

Can the findings reasonably be applied beyond the study sample or setting?

Consider population, setting, context and how closely they match the situation of interest.

9

Research value

Does the study make a useful contribution to the evidence base?

Consider relevance, originality, implications and how the study fits with other evidence.

10

Randomisation

Was allocation to study groups carried out using an appropriate random process?

Consider how the allocation sequence was generated and whether allocation could have been predicted.

11

Group comparability

Were the groups sufficiently similar at the start of the study?

Look for important baseline differences that could affect interpretation of the outcome.

12

Blinding

Were reasonable steps taken to reduce knowledge of group allocation where possible?

Consider participants, clinicians and outcome assessors, while recognising that blinding is not always feasible.

What is critical appraisal?

Critical appraisal helps you judge whether research methods, findings and conclusions are sufficiently trustworthy and relevant for your academic question or practice context.

Assess methodology

Examine study design, sampling, data collection and analysis.

Consider bias

Identify limitations, confounding and other threats to the credibility of the findings.

Judge applicability

Decide how relevant the findings are to your population, setting and research question.

Study designs supported

Randomised controlled trials

Review randomisation, baseline group comparability, blinding, outcome measurement and confidence in the results.

Qualitative studies

Consider methodological fit, sampling, researcher influence, qualitative analysis and credibility of interpretations.

Cohort studies

Examine exposure and outcome measurement, confounding, participant selection and applicability of associations.

Systematic reviews

Evaluate the search strategy, eligibility criteria, quality assessment and appropriateness of the evidence synthesis.

Critical appraisal FAQs

What is critical appraisal?

Critical appraisal is the structured evaluation of research methods, findings, limitations, relevance and trustworthiness.

Is this the official CASP checklist?

No. This tool uses original wording based on broad evidence-appraisal principles. If your university requires a specific CASP checklist, use the official version required by your course.

Should I calculate a score from critical appraisal?

Not necessarily. The Yes, No and Unclear counts in this tool help you track your appraisal, but methodological quality should be interpreted by considering the importance of each issue rather than relying on a simple numerical score alone.

Go from critical appraisal to evidence-based writing

PaperNexa helps you discover academic sources, analyse evidence, identify limitations, compare studies, plan assignments and write with citations in one research workspace.

Try PaperNexa for the complete version